{"id":3826,"date":"2026-01-06T04:00:41","date_gmt":"2026-01-06T12:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/max2voyages.com\/?p=3826"},"modified":"2026-01-06T04:00:41","modified_gmt":"2026-01-06T12:00:41","slug":"2026-tesla-model-y-vs-2025-ford-mustang-mach-e-old-guard-evs-vie-for-supremacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/?p=3826","title":{"rendered":"2026 Tesla Model Y vs. 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E: Old Guard EVs Vie for Supremacy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The midsize electric SUV segment is a relatively new one, but the Tesla Model Y<\/u> and Ford Mustang Mach-E<\/u> have been in it from the jump and continue to be its bestsellers despite an onslaught of fresh competition. They\u2019ve maintained their positions with continual refinements and updates\u2014digital and mechanical\u2014the latest of which have just arrived.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The 2026 Tesla Model Y boasts its first significant refresh, code-named Juniper, featuring a host of improvements, while the 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E continues on its evolutionary path. Are Tesla\u2019s predictable but much-needed upgrades enough to keep it on top, or are the more targeted enhancements Ford has made to the Mach-E enough to finally push it past the longtime segment leader? Let\u2019s go for a drive.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"037<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What\u2019s New with the Model Y<\/strong><\/h2>\n

You can tell right away by looking at them that the Tesla\u2019s had the more obvious exterior work done<\/u>. Unfortunately, the styling updates to the Model Y are, quite frankly, a step backward in our opinion. We can forgive the Cybertruck lightbar up front to some extent, but the rear end is simply terrible. Multiple judges likened it to something you\u2019d see from some knock-off Chinese car company no one ever heard of before.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the opposite inside, where Tesla has clearly put in the work. The interior now feels richer and far more befitting the car\u2019s price. We particularly like the cloth trim and genuine two-tone color scheme punctuated by ambient lighting, and we appreciate it carrying throughout the cabin. The new rear screen is a neat idea in theory, but it\u2019s mounted by your shins, which limits your ability to watch streaming content on it or use it in any real way other than as a fancy climate control interface.<\/p>\n

Tesla giveth, Tesla also taketh away. The Model Y\u2019s shifter stalk is no longer, replaced by a digital slider on the upper left corner of the screen (there\u2019s also a backup touch-sensitive controller on the ceiling between the lights) and augmented by software designed to anticipate (usually correctly) whether you\u2019d like to move into drive or reverse. It all takes a little getting used to, as swiping up and down is little different than pushing or pulling a lever up or down.<\/p>\n

Tesla at least left the turn signal stalk for the Model Y, a welcome retreat from the updated Model 3<\/u>. The collection of buttons on the steering wheel is unusual, but at least you have them. Everything else is done through its one and only screen, which is starting to get awfully cluttered, especially when you open the menu and browse the dozens of apps it can run.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"022<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n


<\/h2>\n

What\u2019s New with the Mach-E<\/strong><\/h2>\n

As Ford has forgone a big midlife refresh, the Mach-E has less to show at first glance. Far and away the biggest change is the shifter stalk on the steering column (right where the Model Y\u2019s used to be), replacing the much-loathed dial shifter on the center console. Not only do we prefer the action of the stalk, but we also like how Ford used the space where the dial used to be to add storage cubbies, including one you can stand a phone in when you don\u2019t need to juice it up instead by laying it down in the charger.<\/p>\n

Other improvements have come over time rather than all at once. Ford upgraded the rear motor last year and pushed out new software to improve performance, powertrain cooling, and charging. And the Mach-E\u2019s interior has improved beyond the shifter, with attractive cloth trim and contrast stitching applied to both the front and back rows. Following Tesla\u2019s lead, the infotainment software has been updated several times over the years, as has Ford\u2019s BlueCruise hands-free driving assistant.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"001<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Driving Differences<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Model Y\u2019s most significant upgrade is hiding behind its wheels. New shock absorbers have greatly improved its ride, with the caveat being just how low a bar that is. The old Model Y never rode well, but that doesn\u2019t completely diminish what\u2019s been achieved here. The new one rides acceptably well, though it still crashes over larger bumps. Tesla has also made significant strides in quieting the Model Y\u2019s cabin noise. The tires can get chatty on bad pavement, but as a whole it\u2019s noticeably quieter inside than the Ford.<\/p>\n

The Mach-E always rode well, and that hasn\u2019t changed. It\u2019s a bit stiffer than the Tesla, but as we\u2019ll see, that pays off in the handling. Bumps are dispatched more assuredly, and body motions are better controlled, making the Ford far more pleasant on a long jaunt than the Tesla.<\/p>\n

Each offers a one-pedal driving option for those who prefer it and the ability to turn it off for those who don\u2019t. Both slow the car aggressively, requiring careful control of the accelerator pedal, and for this reason we appreciate the ability to alter the regenerative braking level on the Tesla that can help further smooth out the experience.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"010<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Differences in Comfort<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Moving or not, we generally preferred the Ford\u2019s seats. They\u2019re softer and have more give in the cushions, especially in the rear. On the other hand, the Model Y feels airier and more spacious, especially in the back. The Mach-E suffers in part from a smaller rear door opening, making it harder to get in and out of, and once you\u2019re back there, it\u2019s a tighter fit. In fact, the Tesla is better packaged in general, offering more space for both passengers and cargo. Both vehicles are hatchbacks, yet the Model Y offers more space with the rear seats folded and also offers a large, hidden compartment under the cargo floor. The Mach-E has a smaller compartment that\u2019s taken up by a tire repair kit and portable charger. Each has a frunk (front trunk), as well, and both are large enough to be genuinely useful, but the Tesla\u2019s is noticeably bigger.<\/p>\n

Both cars come with panoramic sunroofs, but we\u2019ll take the Ford\u2019s smaller sheet of glass and its physical sunshade all day long. The Model Y tries to get by with tint and anti-UV coatings, but on a pleasant summer day, judges felt like they were broiling in a solar oven. The Ford\u2019s power shade was deeply appreciated, especially considering the flimsy, see-through accessory shade Tesla has the nerve to charge $105 for.<\/p>\n

Blasting the air conditioning helps, of course, and here again we prefer Ford\u2019s traditional solution. Vents you physically adjust don\u2019t need to be disrupted. While the science behind Tesla\u2019s semi-hidden air vents is indisputably cool, we simply don\u2019t care. Having to adjust the airflow with the screen is dumb, and every manufacturer that does it needs to knock it off.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"008<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Tech Differences<\/strong><\/h2>\n

As for the screens themselves, we\u2019re mixed but leaning toward the Ford. The Mach-E portrait orientation has its pluses and minuses, always keeping more functions available, but pushing some of them down to your knees requires moving your eyes well off the road to use them. We also like the multifunction knob on the screen that does volume, temperature, and seat heaters\/coolers.<\/p>\n

The Model Y\u2019s landscape interface is slicker but has its own issues. Pushing everything to the screen while trying to retain a minimalist look requires burying far too many common functions in menus. We also still don\u2019t like having to look over there to see critical information like the speedometer, battery level, and driver assistance status.<\/p>\n

Both screens drove us crazy with their insistence on moving things around. Each tries to be helpful by rearranging apps on a lower dock based on which ones you\u2019ve been using most frequently, and we hate it. Trying to find specific functions while driving is much harder when they keep moving around.<\/p>\n

An easy fix is to just use Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, at least in the Ford. Tesla refuses to incorporate either, which was a deal-breaker for some judges.<\/p>\n

Similarly, Tesla\u2019s insistence on creating a pixelated heat map parking aid rather than employing a 360-degree camera system common to so many cars, Mach-E included, is disappointing. We\u2019d rather see what we\u2019re at risk of hitting in the parking lot than an approximation.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"011<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

FSD (Supervised) or BlueCruise?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

We can\u2019t talk tech without addressing the semi-automated driver assistance systems in the room. Tesla\u2019s \u201cFull Self-Driving (Supervised)\u201d gets all the headlines, but is it better than Ford\u2019s BlueCruise? It\u2019s complicated, but in a word, no.<\/p>\n

Our verdict comes down to results. BlueCruise does everything it promises and does those things very well<\/u>. FSD (Supervised) does more things but does them inconsistently at best and sometimes downright poorly<\/u>.<\/p>\n

Both systems take over acceleration, braking, and steering when activated, but only BlueCruise is hands-free. Tesla still makes you hold the wheel and jiggle it occasionally to prove you’re remaining engaged. Both make fully automatic lane changes, deciding on their own to move over and pass slower traffic then move back afterward. We found BlueCruise to be the better system at moving the car back over.<\/p>\n

Each system also uses driver-monitoring cameras to ensure drivers are looking at the road while the system is engaged. Here, again, we found BlueCruise to be superior. It was able to see the driver more consistently, resulting in fewer disengagements and false warnings to look at the road. FSD (Supervised) struggled more with sunglasses and would switch back and forth between \u201cadvanced\u201d camera-based monitoring and basic steering wheel input monitoring, throwing endless notifications on the screen. Speaking of, BlueCruise is far better at communicating visually with the driver thanks to a small instrument cluster screen above the steering wheel; that screen turns blue when BlueCruise is engaged. Tesla\u2019s combination of subtler visual indicators over on the center screen takes more effort to monitor while driving.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"014<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

In terms of how they actually drove, we found the systems to be generally equal. Both are good at keeping the vehicle in the center of the lane even around corners, accelerating and braking naturally, changing lanes assertively but safely, and reacting to other vehicles. We like the ability to adjust how aggressive the system drives in the Tesla, but we\u2019re fine with the Ford\u2019s singular attitude.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s no denying FSD (Supervised) has more functions and operates in far more environments, but this advantage is also its undoing. Whereas BlueCruise only operates on pre-mapped highways, it does so superbly. FSD (Supervised) works on any road, but your experience will vary significantly. We were impressed by its ability to recognize and respond to stop signs and traffic lights without driver input. Outside of town, though, it struggled mightily on narrow country roads with only yellow centerlines and no white lines on the shoulders. Navigate on Autopilot chose the country road then proceeded to drive like a scared teenager, slowing to as little as 15 mph for corners and crossing the centerline multiple times before we turned it off.<\/p>\n

We tried that feature again on the highway and sure enough, it drove us all the way to our hotel with no driver inputs. It was truly impressive, right up until it reached its destination. Each judge was dropped off in a different location and none of them actually in the hotel parking lot. Sure, the car would enter the correct parking lot every time, but then it would panic and leave. One person was taken around back to the service entrance, another across the street to a different business. In one case, the car prepared to exit the parking lot, put its turn signal on, pulled halfway into traffic, then stopped with its signal still on and declared itself done.<\/p>\n

Given this and our overall experience with FSD (Supervised) in our long-term Model Y, we remain unconfident in the technology. It simply makes too many errors for us to trust it. BlueCruise is more limited, but it does exactly what it says it will without seeing \u201cghosts,\u201d getting confused, or making dangerous maneuvers\u2014all of which FSD (Supervised) is prone to do at times.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"005<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

A Difference in Charging<\/strong><\/h2>\n

In the past, entire MotorTrend<\/em> comparisons have been decided on the EV charging experience. Tesla used to hold an enormous advantage thanks to its homegrown Supercharger network, but it has ceded that leverage by opening up the network to competing automakers<\/u>. Yes, the Mach-E requires an adapter, and it\u2019s expensive at $200, but it completely eliminates the hassle of public charging. Ford\u2019s built-in route planner has also closed the gap to Tesla\u2019s, eliminating that advantage, as well.<\/p>\n

When it comes to charging, however, the Model Y is still well ahead of the Mach-E. Ford\u2019s battery technology caps fast charging at 150 kW to the Tesla\u2019s 250 kW, and it shows up big time in our testing. The Model Y adds an additional 36 miles of range every 15 minutes compared to the Mach-E, meaning you\u2019ll be done and on your way several minutes sooner.<\/p>\n

Once you\u2019re finally charged up and out on the road, you won\u2019t get any farther in the Tesla. Although its EPA range rating is 11 miles greater than the Mach-E\u2019s, in our Road-Trip Range test\u2014driving at a constant 70 mph until the battery level drops from 100 percent to 5 percent\u2014both cars go the exact same distance of 252 miles. The Model Y will get in and out of the charger quicker, but it won\u2019t get you to your destination that much sooner.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"006<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n


<\/h2>\n

A Difference in Performance<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Mustang name may have been chosen to convey performance, but there\u2019s no sugar-coating it: The Ford was roundly trounced by the Tesla in our instrumented testing. The Model Y is quicker in a straight line no matter the distance, grips harder on the skidpad, and posts a quicker lap on our figure-eight course. The only metric in which the two cars tied is emergency braking from 60 mph to zero.<\/p>\n

But look closer at the numbers, and some interesting context emerges. The Ford generates considerably more torque and multiplies it by shorter gearing, which helps it launch slightly harder. But the Tesla has a bit more horsepower, so above 50 mph, it starts to overtake the Mach-E. In the turning tests, both cars would\u2019ve performed better had their makers allowed them to, Ford with better tires and Tesla with a way to deactivate the traction and stability control. That they tied in braking is also interesting, as the Tesla is both lighter and running higher-performance tires, which should\u2019ve given it an advantage. Instead, the Model Y\u2019s brakes began to fade badly after three tests, whereas the Ford\u2019s held up fine.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"006<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

All that said, the Tesla\u2019s advantage under instrumentation fails to carry over to the real world. The Mach-E is the far more fun car to drive. It lives up to the Mustang name in the corners and demonstrates the advantage of decades of institutional knowledge. Ford knows how to make a car go around corners in a way that\u2019s engaging and rewarding.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s as if a bit of the Mach-E Rally suspension magic<\/u> has been sprinkled on the regular car, which in the past was nice to drive but not nearly this entertaining. The body motions are tight and deliberate, the brakes strong, the steering appropriately weighted and even providing a little feedback. The tires give up too easily, and they’re noisy about it, but they can be replaced.<\/p>\n

The Model Y, by contrast, is a bit too paint-by-numbers in its approach. The steering is very quick but provides no feedback. The body rolls quite a lot, which isn\u2019t inherently bad but in this case lacks the finesse to inspire absolute confidence. It grips well, and the tires don\u2019t complain, nor were the brakes an issue. It accelerates hard in all situations, but that\u2019s kind of its only party trick. None of our judges thought it handled poorly, but none of them would shut up about how much they liked driving the Ford better.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"002<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n


<\/h2>\n

A Difference in Price\u2014and Value<\/strong><\/h2>\n

For a long while, it seemed only Tesla could make a relatively affordable EV, but that\u2019s no longer the case. In fact, this all-wheel-drive Mach-E starts $3,640 cheaper than the all-wheel-drive Model Y here. Both get you with the options, Ford to the tune of about $11,000 in this case and Tesla for $13,000.<\/p>\n

Not only is the Mach-E $5,000 cheaper as-tested, but it\u2019s a better value to boot. As we\u2019ve seen, it\u2019s more comfortable, rides better, has equal or better technology, and is more fun to drive. The Tesla has its advantages, but we\u2019re willing to wait a bit longer at the charger and endure a bit more interior noise to save $5,000.<\/p>\n

There Can Be Only One<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Thanks to years of continuous improvements, some small and some large, the Model Y and Mach-E continue to be class leaders and buyer favorites. As a result of those refinements, they\u2019re more closely matched than ever. Historically, the Tesla has been the car to beat in this division, but giving up its charging advantage and betting on unfinished driver assistance software have left it vulnerable. Every judge had the same question coming into this test: Is the Juniper update enough to keep the Model Y on top? The answer is no. Ford\u2019s systematic enhancements, coupled with Tesla\u2019s missteps, have made the Mustang Mach-E the better all-around midsize electric SUV.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
[data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
\n
\"032<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

2nd Place: Tesla Model Y<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
\n

<\/path><\/svg>Pros<\/h3>\n
    \n
  • Improved interior<\/li>\n
  • Charges faster<\/li>\n
  • Big frunk<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    <\/path><\/svg>Cons<\/h3>\n
      \n
    • Ride quality still needs work<\/li>\n
    • FSD (Supervised) is untrustworthy<\/li>\n
    • Looks worse than before<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      Verdict:<\/strong> Tesla rested on its laurels, and that\u2019s starting to catch up with it.<\/p>\n

      \n
      \n
      \n
      [data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
      \n
      \"016<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      1st Place: Ford Mustang Mach-E<\/strong><\/h2>\n
      \n
      \n

      <\/path><\/svg>Pros<\/h3>\n
        \n
      • Fun to drive<\/li>\n
      • BlueCruise delivers<\/li>\n
      • Better value<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
        \n

        <\/path><\/svg>Cons<\/h3>\n
          \n
        • Charges slower<\/li>\n
        • Small frunk<\/li>\n
        • Louder inside<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

          Verdict:<\/strong> It doesn\u2019t need to push boundaries to be the best all-around midsize electric SUV. <\/p>\n

          \n
          \n
          \n
          [data-ids=CardContent]_[data-card-title]]:underline flex-col gap-2″><\/p>\n
          \n
          \"004<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          The midsize electric SUV segment is a relatively new one, but the Tesla Model Y and Ford Mustang<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3827,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[153],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comparison-tests"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3826\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/max2voyages.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}