Hustled through a long stretch of twisty roads, the GTO is arguably more fun, but it’s the Charger that’s more impressive. The GTO, at 189.8 inches and 3777 pounds, feels small, agile, and tossable compared with the 200.1-inch, 4266-pound SRT8. The GTO initially understeers mildly before gradually switching to mid-turn oversteer, at which point the driving experience becomes an entertaining throttle-and-steer shuffle, the Goat dancing and sliding through sweepers in concert with inputs from your right foot and hands. It’s less precise than the Charger, rolling more, feeling less integrated and a bit sloppier, a sensation not helped by the mud-and-snow tires that left it trailing the big Dodge in 60-to-0 braking (138 feet versus 124), on the skidpad (0.83 g versus 0.87), and through the figure eight (26.8 seconds versus 26.3). The Charger exhibits more understeer than the tail-happy GTO, but its mammoth Goodyears provide enough grip to allow the chassis to promptly convert the understeer into neutral behavior that can safely be stimulated with the throttle. The steering is light and precise, the brakes tenacious and fade-free, and the chassis well-conceived, like the front and rear ends reside on the same page. If there’s a nit to pick with the SRT8, it’s the unyielding ride that can bounce your booty over bumpy roads, as if you were trudging along on horseback. Conversely, the Goat coddles its occupants with a much more compliant ride–one of the few benefits to hoofing it with 17-inch wheels.

Before we can give you the bottom line, let’s first examine the bottom line. The Charger SRT8, at $38,095 to start, is considerably pricier than the $33,690 GTO, but the premium isn’t unwarranted, considering it comes with stability control, side airbags, Brembo brakes, and forged wheels with summer tires, not to mention a roomier cabin for five. And keep in mind that the Charger is slapped with a $2100 gas-guzzler tax, which the GTO is burdened with only when equipped with the standard automatic, although for the Pontiac, the tax is a less-invasive $1300. Furthermore, the Dodge’s tasteful interior, which can be outfitted with features unavailable in the GTO–e.g., a navigation system, adjustable pedals, curtain airbags, a sunroof, and a rear-seat video system–feels fittingly modern, stuffed with the kind of accoutrements that buyers want. The Goat, evidenced by its obvious lack of options, not to mention standard features, comes across as somewhat dated in the Charger’s company.

010 2006 dodge charger srt8 2005 pontiac gto

In the end, “out of place” is how we viewed the GTO in context with the Charger. While quicker than the Dodge, the Pontiac felt less refined, less civilized, and less inviting than the Charger. Given the option to drive one, whether on a short stint or a long haul, the Charger is the obvious choice–the best musclecar for the job. Not only does it look the part–no other V-8-powered American sedan appears as ominous–but it plays the part with an involving driving experience, be it sensationally, aesthetically, or acoustically. That’s a powerful argument–one we’re sure Ezra Scattergood would appreciate.

The muscle car is back! And it’s here to stay

Don’t believe for a moment the rekindling of America’s love affair with powerful rear-drive V-8 sedans and coupes is a flash in the pan. This stuff is visceral, deeply ingrained in the psyche of the American driver: The explosion in pickup-truck sales during the 1980s and 1990s was probably driven less by the need to haul stuff than a desire to recapture the fundamental spirit of the American automobile, lost when Detroit switched wholesale to producing ho-hum, appliance-like front-drive cars powered by asthmatic V-6s. Trucks are rear-drive, mostly have V-8s, and don’t look like jellybeans. Or Camrys.

Curiously, it’s the Australians and the Germans who’ve kept alive the spirit of the American musclecar. Both countries have shown musclecars can survive high gas prices (they pay $4 to $6 a gallon) and steep insurance costs. In Australia, where GM, Ford, and Chrysler all made bijou versions of American musclecars in the late 1960s and early 1970s, GM’s Holden subsidiary has built V-8-performance versions of its best-selling Commodore for 25 years.

Mercedes-Benz (with a little help from Porsche) shoehorned a 5.0-liter V-8 under the hood of a W124 E-Class in the early 1990s to create the 500E, a musclecar so subtle that only the slightly pumped front fenders, lower ride height, and16-inch alloy wheels gave you a clue that this somewhat staid-looking sedan could nail 60 mph in under six seconds. Now Mercedes is Europe’s musclecar king, offering AMG-tuned versions of almost every model it makes, some with more than 600 horsepower.

Now both Australia and Germany are helping Detroit build musclecars again. Okay, the current GTO (a Holden with Pontiac makeup) hasn’t sold in the numbers GM expected, but that’s largely because the Aussie car’s restrained styling didn’t match U.S. consumers’ expectations of what a 21st-century Goat should look like. That problem should be solved with the 2008 GTO, which will share its underpinnings and powertrain with the next-generation Commodore, but clothed in much more aggressive, uniquely styled sheetmetal for America.

Chrysler’s rear-drive LX platform was developed using a lot of hardware and know-how from the W210 E-Class, and the SRT versions of the Chrysler 300C, Dodge Magnum, and Dodge Charger are eerily similar in concept and execution to the AMG-badged Benzes. Chrysler will present a concept coupe built on a shortened LX platform at the next Detroit show. The car will carry an iconic name, Dodge Challenger, and our sources say the production version will be the first Chrysler to come off the new LY platform as a 2010 model. And, yes, it’ll be rear drive. With a V-8. By Angus Mackenzie

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories