If their suspensions are merely dissimilar, their engines are poles apart. The Ford is massively torquey. It pulls just over 60 mph in first gear, more than 100 in third, with three still to go. In the Ferrari, one cog lower offers the same effect. The Ford V-8 is all-American in muscle and sound. There’s a faint supercharger whine, but mostly the exhausts wrap you softly in V-8 woofle just as the engine kicks your butt clear to the horizon. I was long into driving it before needing the upper rev range–it’ll turn to 6500, but there’s so much force lower down that I never felt the need to go there. But, when I did, and passed 5500-ish for the first time, a whole new realm of intergalactic surge opened up.

If the Ford has revs to spare, the Ferrari needs and craves them. It goes to 8500 and goes there often. Oh, it’s perfectly tractable at low-to-mid rpm, and each micron of throttle movement gets a corresponding result–albeit, a relatively mild result. Once the feral howl from behind is signaling its optimum operating range, the Maranello V-8 is a scorching experience. The soundscape is less dramatic than the old 360’s manic chorus of different voices, but deeper, more liveable, and more satisfying.

Ford commissioned a new six-speed transaxle for the GT, and its manual shift is like a 911’s, never failing to find its way home. Beside the long, slow, messy Viper and Corvette manuals, it’s a revelation. The Ferrari’s F1 automated sequential manual continues to improve, nearly always finding just the right throttle and clutch modulation for an upshift and blipping the downshifts seamlessly. On these twisting roads, the ability to downshift on a fingertip, while keeping both hands on the wheel, is a bonus. In the Ford, gear-changing might not be necessary, as second and third cover all hard-driving eventualities hereabouts. Ford has set the car to max out in sixth, so then the rest, from fifth to second, could’ve been shuffled upward in ratio, making the car even more accelerative and giving more chances to savor that high-rev muscle and the satisfaction of a cleanly made manual gear change.

Both cars have brakes that’ll punch you in the chest. On the road, the Ford’s iron rotors match the Ferrari’s five-figure carbon ones. Neither will fade nor run out of power, because hard road braking is a question of tire grip (itself determined by things like surface texture, damping, and unsprung weight), not ultimate brake power. That said, we preferred the Ferrari’s pedal travel–as with the steering and throttle, the pedal is simply more precise, like a microtuned precision instrument, and you can back off the pressure by miniscule degrees just as you can add it. Plus, on smooth pavement, the power of the Ferrari’s ultra-exotic system wins out.

Rejoice in the Ford’s crazy retro shape, but there are times it comes back to bite you. Vision is poor to the rear and nonexistent over the shoulders. The windshield pillars approach your eyes closely, blocking out a lot of the arc of a tight bend. In the Ferrari, you sit higher and have a better view to mount an attack on the roadway.

Those cut-roof doors are sheer drama, one of the essential cues to making you feel all Le Mans. They just happen to make the GT completely inaccessible unless the door is wide open: If someone parks next to you while you’re in a restaurant, you won’t be going home. There’s more impracticality in the Ford cabin: The Ferrari has a front trunk and space for a case behind each seat; the Ford has a smaller, autoclave-hot trunk by the radiators and supercharger-size subwoofer filling the space behind the seats. That bass bin is part of an optional stereo package: The CD-radio may be styled to look like a 1970s eight-track machine, but it’s actually a $4000 McIntosh ear-melter.

012 2005 ford gt vs ferrari f 430

This retro theme runs through the Ford cabin: the layout of the dials (it takes a bit of acclimatization to look there for the speedo) and the shape of the switchgear below them, plus the HVAC dials under your elbow. But there are nasty mass-market stalks, and the leather is PVC-like. The Ferrari, too, echoes its exterior in the cabin. The face air vents aren’t unlike the taillights, resembling eyes bulging out of the head of a straining athlete and the pouting lips of the passenger-side airbag cover mimic the car’s rear face. The Ferrari uses more authentic materials in its cabin: real carbon fiber, solid aluminum, leather with the aroma and soft waxy touch of the genuine article.

The original GT40 might have been built to beat Ferrari, but from the reborn GT’s get-go, its engineers knew there was no point building a Ferrari facsimile. The GT had to go its own way. It does. Its immense torque and supple suspension make it a better companion on the way to your favorite secret route. And, when you get there, its straight-line performance and ultimate grip take no prisoners. But wait: The F430 isn’t impossible on a daily roadway, and it wins on visibility and space. Sure, the ride is plain hard, but the engine is amazingly tractable for one so highly tuned, and the F1 transmission will slur unobtrusively in traffic.

The Ferrari feels more special, like every single part of its mechanical organs is machined from a billet, with no tolerance or lash anywhere. It’s a device of startlingly well-oiled precision, and you feel that whether you’re wafting or racing. When you’re at the racer’s edge, that electrifying degree of connection is more than enough compensation for even the Ford’s seismic power. The Ford returns to Michigan with its head held high–but without an overall victory.

007 2005 ford gt vs ferrari f 430

Airplanes vs. Video Games

It’s no coincidence we’re at a regional airstrip for straight-line testing of these two cars–either one could take flight at the end of a quarter mile at speeds in excess of 120 mph. In the 360 Modena and all prior models with a Ferrari F1 manual transmission, launch strategy involved turning off the traction control, selecting first gear, taking both feet off the pedals, whacking the throttle, and waiting for the clutch to drop at some random rpm. From that point–until it was time to grab second gear–getting a good number was an exercise in pedaling the throttle to allow wheelspin, but not too much to achieve a 0-to-30-mph time below 2.0 seconds. With the introduction of a selectable-rpm launch control in the F430 F1, the result is greater predictability and repeatability. As before, the driver turns off CST traction control, but now selects launch control and keeps his left foot on the brake while raising the revs with his right foot. Releasing the brake rapidly engages the clutch and off you go. Because the airstrip was grippy on one end and slippery on the other, effective launch-rpm needed to vary from 3200 to 3600 rpm.

As with previous Ferraris, chirping the rear tires without spinning excessively is the key to a good run. With the F430 set in this launch mode, 8500-rpm upshifts occur with a casual tap of the right paddle, but are well executed every time. Our Race Pak GPS data logger indicated textbook-perfect upshifts that don’t allow the engine to overrev between gear changes–meaning, the car won’t produce those black stripes when the clutch reengages after the next higher gear is selected. Ferrari’s claim of 15-millisecond shifts is optimistic. Our best shifts ranged between 21 and 29 milliseconds and occurred at the following speeds: first to second at 47 mph; second to third at 72 mph; third to fourth at 96 mph; fourth to fifth at 122 mph; and sixth gear was never needed.

The most noticeable difference between pulling the trigger on the new F430 and the 360 Modena or Challenge Stradale (besides 722cc greater displacement and 58 additional horsepower) is that the all-new flat-plane crank V-8 also features variable intake- and exhaust-valve timing. The new engine is more tractable and doesn’t require big revs to make torque or power as it did before. A full 80 percent of the engine’s torque is now available at 3500 rpm–right at the launch’s sweet spot. The throttle’s previous toggle-switch character has been replaced with a more variable and predictable pedal.

If it sounds like there’s a lot to think about while launching the Ferrari, running the supercharged Ford GT down the quarter mile is comparatively easy. With 12.4-inch-wide rear tires, the GT has so much available grip that a launch nearly the same as the Ferrari’s 3500 rpm was needed. With first gear engaged and the clutch pedal on the floor, 3200 to 3500 rpm was all that was necessary to nail a 1.7-second 0-to-30-mph time–that’s quick. It’s all first gear from there until after 60 mph when the tach reaches its 6500-rpm redline. We were told that, if we snatched second gear at 62 mph and heard the supercharger belt chirp, we got the shift speed right. We heard that chirp (and left scratch marks) three times in the quarter mile with shift speed ranging from 16 to 29 milliseconds. The balance of the shifts occurred at the following speeds: second to third at 93 mph; third to fourth at 126 mph; and we never needed fifth. We’ve tested the GT twice before and, while this test yielded a slightly quicker 0-to-60-mph time of 3.6 seconds (previously 3.7), this car’s quarter-mile time and, more telling, terminal speed were off. The previous best was recorded for our October 2004 “Top Speed” story at 11.2 seconds at 131.2 mph. This time out, our U.K.-based GT with over 12,000 journalist-miles on the clock clicked off consistent quarter-mile blasts of 11.7 seconds at 126.2 mph.

But the story doesn’t end there. After we shared our data with Ferrari and Ford personnel (who were largely pleased), the factory Ferrari driver hinted that his car might be able to “make a better result” with a little-known launch technique. Insisting that this technique is for qualified drivers (and they blessed me with that status) and is not publicized by Ferrari, il piloto showed me the “not-recommended” protocol. Just like getting the cheat code for a video game, it involves a series of button pushes and shift-paddle manipulations that wouldn’t occur by accident in normal driving. When it’s set up, the car is in first gear with the clutch engaged and spinning. Holding the car in place with the brakes, the driver shoots the revs up to 4000 rpm and releases the brake pedal. Rather than spinning the tires, the clutch spins down from 4000 rpm until it locks up at the top of first gear for a launch that’d be about as smooth and quick as those you see on a Formula 1 grid. At 1.3 seconds to 30 mph, the “secret” Ferrari chops two to three tenths from every measured speed and finishes the quarter mile only one tenth of a second and 3.4 mph behind the GT. In our spec chart, we ran the “normal” and “secret” launch acceleration numbers in parentheses. For shift speeds and relative acceleration rates, see the above graph for the best recorded runs of these two cars. -Chris Walton

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories